1972-VIL-69-SC-DT
Equivalent Citation: [1972] 86 ITR 1 (SC)
Supreme Court of India
Civil Appeal No 1831 of 1970.
Date: 29.03.1972
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CALCUTTA
Vs
STANDARD VACUUM OIL CO.
For the Respondent : M. C. Chagla, Senior Advocate (Mrs. Anjali K. Verma and J. B. Dadachanji, Advocates)
For the Intervener : A. K. Sen, Senior Advocate (T. A. Ramachandran and D. N. Gupta, Advocates)
BENCH
SIKRI C.J., A. N. GROVER, A. N. RAY, D. G. PALEKAR AND M. H. BEG
JUDGMENT
SIKRI C.J.-
M/S. Standard Vacuum Oil Co. Ltd., the assessee, claimed to deduct Rs. 5,63,670 payable as wealth-tax for the assessment year 1959-60, from its assessable income for that year. The Income-tax Officer disallowed the claim. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner upheld the order of the Income-tax Officer. The Appellate Tribunal, however, came to the conclusion that the expenditure incurred was incidental to business and allowed the claim of the assessee, observing that the wealth-tax payments should be allowed in the years when they are actually paid.
At the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, the following question was referred to the High Court:
" Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, having regard to the provisions of the Wealth-tax Act of 1957, the allowance of wealth-tax liability was correct?"
The High Court answered the question in favour of the assessee. This judgment of the High Court is dated November 24, 1964. The revenue obtained certificate of fitness from the High Court and appealed to us.
Following our decision in Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax, judgment delivered just now, the appeal is dismissed. Parties will bear their own costs throughout.
Appeal dismissed.
DISCLAIMER: Though all efforts have been made to reproduce the order accurately and correctly however the access, usage and circulation is subject to the condition that VATinfoline Multimedia is not responsible/liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any mistake/error/omissions.